BrandSavant

Gaining Insight From Social Media Data

The Venn Diagram That Could Destroy Your Business

by Tom Webster on February 4, 2012

A simple concept, simply illustrated. Some small percentage of Internet users create content on the social web – let’s call it 10% for discussion – while the remainder do things like curate, consume, etc. Also, some percentage of your customers represent your core customers – the people who are most passionate and loyal purchasers of your product. Again, for the sake of argument, let’s also call that 10% of your customer base. So, you have a small percentage of content creators, and a small percentage of business drivers. That’s what you know.

Here is what you probably don’t know: where those two types of people intersect, i.e., what percentage of the people talking about your brand on the social web are also your best customers? Ideally, there is some overlap here, as my brilliantly artistic Venn diagram suggests:

HealthyVenn

The intersection of those two circles – the passionate, core consumers who also talk about your brand online – is gold, right? You want to make these people happy, don’t you? Well, yes and no. You do if and only if you can actually identify them. And you can’t identify them, unless you know what that Venn diagram looks like for your brand.

Not knowing what this diagram looks like can destroy your brand, if you use the social web as an input. Your quickest path to extinction is to make business decisions based upon information mined from social media if you don’t know what your Venn diagram looks like – and if it turns out to look significantly different to the one above.

There are two distinctly different dangers here – one obvious; the other, less so. Here’s the obvious one:

UnhealthyVenn

In this instance, the people talking about your brand and the people who actually buy your stuff have very little overlap. Here, mining social media for insight serves not as a proxy for “voice of consumer,” but as a dangerously irrelevant “voice of the noisy.” And if you don’t actually know what this Venn looks like for your business, you run the very real risk of ruining your product, brand or reputation with your actual customers if you derive “actionable” insights from the social web that turn out to be irrelevant banter. In other words, if the folks at Maybach designed their cars based upon mining Twitter data, they’d probably have a jacuzzi in the trunk.

Again, where the values of social content creators align with the values of your core customers, social data is potentially useful, but not always useful. Consider this, very different Venn diagram:

OpTrap

The amateur mind sees this as an optimal situation – after all, your core customers and your social content creators are in near-perfect alignment, right? Yet this Venn could kill your business just as efficiently as the previous example – indeed, it might even happen before you realize it.

This sinister pattern is what I would call the Optimization Trap. Slavishly following clickstream data will get you here quicker than anything. Imagine, if you will, mining your data to discover that Fridays are the best day to send your emails, and farm implements are your most successful topics. So, you send out Friday Farm Implement emails. From there, you mine your Twitter data to discover that most of your audience is athletic, so you tweak your Friday Farm Implement email to talk about combining farming and exercise. Subsequent mining reveals that your Friday Farming Activity emails are most often opened by young men, so you include videos of top models using your farm implements for various activities.

With each optimization, you’ve actually veered further and further away from the dead center of your market. If you over-optimize, you end up continually refocusing on ever-smaller bullseyes, moving closer and closer to irrelevance and away from the needs of the majority of your market. Eventually, you will achieve nearly 100% optimization, making five people really happy. You’ll be like the frog placed in a pot of cold water, slowly heated to boiling. By the time you realize you’re in trouble, you’re being served with garlic butter and a nice green salad. Tastes like chicken!

Two of these Venn diagrams could kill your business – if you make decisions based upon social data and don’t know what your diagram looks like. Luckily for you, it isn’t rocket science to draw your brand’s diagram – if you do the work. This is the kind of work I do for clients every day, but the most important thing you can do to determine these things about your customers is simply to ask them. Only when you calibrate your social data mining with other online or offline research can you know the nature of your two circles. Figuring out the size of these circles – and the extent to which they overlap – is the key to making social media data useful. Not doing the work is negligence at best, and could indeed be fatal.

Sorry about my “art.” I won’t quit my day job. :)

Buffer
  • http://www.businessesgrow.com Mark W. Schaefer

    This is so relevant to some of my current thoughts.  I have been thinking about the current McDonalds “fail.”  98% of the comments on their Twitter experiment were positive.  I’m guessing some (most?) of the 2% of haters were not core customers. And yet they hijacked the dialogue. The social web’s view of “your customers” may be quite different than reality. Lots to think about.

  • http://www.edisonresearch.com Tom Webster

    It’s really a common issue in my business, but it looms exponentially larger in the realm of social media. Again, it isn’t a black box mystery to suss out what that diagram looks like for your brand – and when you do, you’d best act accordingly. Thanks so much for the comment, Mark.

  • http://twitter.com/NoFunRich Rich Miller

    Great article, but it can easily be applied to software development, too.  It is typically a very small percentage that will complain about a software build which is what one can find that a development team will focus on, instead of focusing on the the other 90% that are happy with what one has built.  It’s a tricky path to walk when trying to satisfy, capture, and keep customers.

  • http://twitter.com/KellyeCrane Kellye Crane

    Excellent explanation! Far too many are overly focused on engagement metrics
    (for example, how many comments a blog post gets), but fail to map it to the larger objectives. Your masterful artwork gets the point across — I’ll be sharing this widely.

  • http://www.312digital.com Sean McGinnis

    Yes yes YES! I remember having detailed discussions with a business about the dangers of the echo chamber.

    They were talking about building a custom key word research database based off internal analytics. What a HUGE mistake that would have been.

    A downward slide into irrelevance by continually optimizing only against keywords you were already performing for.

    I can’t believe it was even suggested. Would have been catastrophic beyond words.

  • Anonymous

    Great article! Leveraged properly, core customers can be an extension of your marketing department. Endorsements from this group on social media platforms go a long way with prospects. We stay connected to our core customer group through email. While a percentage of our customers are on social media, those platforms can get rather noisy. Our opt-in email list has a solid open rate, so we can be sure our message reaches the right customer. 

  • http://twitter.com/AliHandscomb Ali Handscomb

    Interesting insight into people’s search for Gold in online relationships which translate to business opportunities. I am not a fan of the numbers game either because number of followers doesnt mean people love you or your business. 

    I think the same could be said of SEO to be honest sometimes business buys into this concept and so their profile or brand looks like gobbledigook. 

    Thanks for the diagrams though they helped me as I am a visual person but I like to keep things simple!

  • http://keithbrown.com/ Keith

    You had me at boiling frog, although I think a ton of us don’t realize we’re already in hot water w/ social media…

  • http://www.facebook.com/lutz.finger Lutz Finger

    Thanks for the post… I bet the Galaxy Marketeers will love your article. http://bit.ly/wV6jbb – But what is your conclusion? Not to measure at all? 

    This probably can not be the right way (I have to say it, since I founded Fisheye Analytics). The missing part in the Venn diagram you drew is the INFLUENCE. If you make “five people really happy” and those five tell this on to the world, then you have amplified your impact. Even when the rest of your customers at this very moment were not amazed. 

    Now what is INFLUENCE…. well this measurement can go easily as wrong as you described in your post: http://bit.ly/w4tfSF

  • http://www.tommartin.typepad.com Tom Martin

    As usual, outstandingly simple explanation of a complex challenge. Question though: how would you suggest using research to make sure you don’t over optimize?

  • http://twitter.com/webby2001 Tom Webster

    I think, though, if you are only making five people very happy, they’d either better be the most influential people in the WORLD, or you’d better be making custom yachts or something. And if, to me, they are the *wrong* five people, you might be doing more harm than good. 

  • http://twitter.com/webby2001 Tom Webster

    Well, the key is to simultaneously be doing research on the *opportunity,* to calibrate all the transactional data you are collecting from clicks and tweets. If you are making a small group of people super happy, but the market is telling you that there are a lot of *unhappy* people out there, you might be missing a significant hole in the market that your clickstream data blinds you to. Survey + Server = Success.

  • http://twitter.com/webby2001 Tom Webster

    Thanks, Kellye!

  • http://twitter.com/webby2001 Tom Webster

    Super example, Sean – that’s just exactly the wrong way to go about it. The thing about echoes – they never get stronger.

Previous post:

Next post: