<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Context of Online Surveys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/the-context-of-online-surveys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/the-context-of-online-surveys/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/the-context-of-online-surveys/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=92#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thanks for responding! Which one are you, Cat Lady or Fringe-y?

This increasing barrage, as you aptly put it, is going to give market research a permanent black eye, and you are right to question just who is answering these things. Actually, it doesn&#039;t even matter who is answering them, the problem is the non-response bias. Surveys have to start being more transactional, and start treating respondents&#039; time as valuable, or cat ladies will be designing everything. No offense, cats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding! Which one are you, Cat Lady or Fringe-y?</p>
<p>This increasing barrage, as you aptly put it, is going to give market research a permanent black eye, and you are right to question just who is answering these things. Actually, it doesn&#8217;t even matter who is answering them, the problem is the non-response bias. Surveys have to start being more transactional, and start treating respondents&#8217; time as valuable, or cat ladies will be designing everything. No offense, cats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/the-context-of-online-surveys/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=92#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Is there an &quot;abuse bias&quot; that the collector would need to tease out? What demographic profiles gravitate toward responding in an ever increasing barrage of requests. Are cat ladies, random fringe-y people and peopke with a tremendous amount of free time informing how our products/services are designed? Inserting my bias of course, but I rarely complete these surveys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an &#8220;abuse bias&#8221; that the collector would need to tease out? What demographic profiles gravitate toward responding in an ever increasing barrage of requests. Are cat ladies, random fringe-y people and peopke with a tremendous amount of free time informing how our products/services are designed? Inserting my bias of course, but I rarely complete these surveys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

