BrandSavant

Gaining Insight From Social Media Data

Marketing Metrics And Head Injuries

by Tom Webster on August 20, 2012

NewImageThe two aren’t as unrelated as they might seem. Consider the following scenario: You run an e-commerce site that sells real or virtual products with some kind of online shopping cart system. You make a tweak to your sales process–maybe add a step, or make your offer page longer–and observe that your percentage of “abandoned carts” (when people add your product to their cart and then, after seemingly reconsidering, exit your site without making a purchase) increases considerably.

Did the changes you made to your sales process have a negative effect?

Well, there are three answers to this. The obvious answer is “yes.” The obvious answer for contrarians who always suspect trick questions is “no.”

The answer that would get you hired at Edison is…you don’t know (yet.)

So why wouldn’t an increase in abandoned shopping carts automatically be bad? The short answer is that abandoned shopping carts, in a vacuum, is the wrong metric to track.

To explain, here’s a little nugget of statistical lore from World War I. In the early days of the war, soldiers were sent out with cloth hats–about as bullet-proof as my Mets hat. By 1915, the mounting, horrific number of deaths caused by head wounds prompted the armies of the Great War to begin issuing metal helmets to their soldiers. The Brodie Helmet (pictured), developed in 1915, represented a real breakthrough in personnel armor, as each helmet could be stamped from a single piece of steel, making these helmets efficient to mass produce.

As more and more soldiers became equipped with helmets, a curious statistic was observed: the number of head injuries that army hospitals had to treat skyrocketed. That’s right–head injuries increased dramatically as a result of the introduction of helmets.

The answer to this conundrum, of course, is that head injuries increased because more soldiers were surviving head shots. Tracking head injuries, in this case, is the wrong metric–or, at least, it doesn’t tell the story in a vacuum. The right metric to track comes down to outcomes–are fewer soldiers dying of head shots?

So, back to shopping carts. Abandoned shopping carts (and other peripheral stats) may or may not tell the story of the data you have. For example, if cart abandonment goes up, but so do sales, then the answer might be that your changes have attracted more “non-core” consumers–more casual shoppers–but the bottom line is that you have attracted more shoppers. You cannot gauge a metric like abandoned carts negatively or positively unless you consider your outcomes.

Now let’s be careful out there.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • http://www.convinceandconvert.com/ jaybaer

    In terms of cart abandonment in particular, you also have to have a handle on cart to buy latency.

    For example, I’ve run some test projects in the past where we tried to uncover what was the most effective time horizon to encourage shoppers to come back and check out their abandoned cart, and via what media (email, retargeted banner ad, even mailed postcard).

    So, to switch back to your regularly scheduled analogy, if you’re looking at a holistic cost/benefit analysis, it’s not just a question of did soldiers die of head wounds, but how long did it take them to die?

  • http://twitter.com/megtripp Meg Fowler Tripp

    Not to mention the number of soldiers positioned in the line of fire, the tools of war (new guns or ammunition types), and evolving approaches to medicine / triage on the front lines… data! data! data!

  • http://raulcolon.net/ Raul Colon

    I see many companies like for example Avis every time I go in and try to reserve let’s say a minivan I leave because there are none available. They send me an email sometimes with a promo code to help me finish the reservation.

    The problem is that they are not asking me why I left. So every time I log in and end up renting from a competitor when the other day I verified with an Avis employee and the person confirmed they have minivans.

    If they where human and did not send an automated message they would realize that they could do a lot more business with me if they gave me access to the car I want.

    When I build websites I have a similar problem. People want to pop up in the first search rankings on google based on whatever search term that goes into their heads not what clients and customers are looking for. They measure what ranking they pop up on based on information that there customers might not be looking for.

    Example if you sell cars they might put the name cars Puerto Rico and expect to pop up first. When a client might be writing Honda dealerships in San Juan.

    Great post!

  • http://www.edisonresearch.com Tom Webster

    Great example, Raul–thanks for reading, as always!

  • http://www.edisonresearch.com Tom Webster

    Just so, Meg “Confounding Variables” Tripp.

  • http://www.edisonresearch.com Tom Webster

    What a super point, Jay–though, I fear we are torturing my poor analogy (and some soldiers) in its service. You’re a smartie.

  • Joshua Franklin

    Great reminder of big picture perpective, and another perfectly crafted blog post!

Previous post:

Next post: