<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn User Base Grows 300% In Two Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-442</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=540#comment-442</guid>
		<description>You would think that it would be impossible to misssspell &quot;purty,&quot; but there I gone and done it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that it would be impossible to misssspell &#8220;purty,&#8221; but there I gone and done it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Waldow</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Waldow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=540#comment-441</guid>
		<description>Tom - 

&quot;Pert darn good.&quot; Did you mean, &quot;Pert darn gerd&quot;? In all seriousness, I agree that the numbers are staggering when put in proper perspective. As you said, I was comparing to Twitter and Facebook.

So ... I&#039;d be interested in seeing awareness/usage numbers for other sites to compare. Are they available?

DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;Pert darn good.&#8221; Did you mean, &#8220;Pert darn gerd&#8221;? In all seriousness, I agree that the numbers are staggering when put in proper perspective. As you said, I was comparing to Twitter and Facebook.</p>
<p>So &#8230; I&#8217;d be interested in seeing awareness/usage numbers for other sites to compare. Are they available?</p>
<p>DJ Waldow<br />
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory<br />
@djwaldow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=540#comment-438</guid>
		<description>I think there are two ways to look at that number, DJ.  One is that it is actually quite a huge number, if you examine it under its own merits. Our survey sample is all persons 12+, which includes a lot of  teens, retirees, homemakers, and a good chunk of Americans who aren&#039;t even online, so a number like this, which is nearly 70 million Americans, is pert darn good for a site that really does have a specialized use case.  When 70 million Americans are aware of BrandSavant.com, I will almost certainly have to add an employee :)

The other way to look at it is that it is, as you suggest, a low number - but a number is only low in comparison to some other frame of reference.  In this case, the number looks low compared to Facebook and Twitter, which are the other frames of reference we have released in this data set.  To that I would probably offer that it isn&#039;t so much that the LinkedIn number is low, but that the Twitter number is crazy huge.

In either case it speaks to the potential LinkedIn still has to grow.

Awesome question, DJ - you keep comin&#039; back, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are two ways to look at that number, DJ.  One is that it is actually quite a huge number, if you examine it under its own merits. Our survey sample is all persons 12+, which includes a lot of  teens, retirees, homemakers, and a good chunk of Americans who aren&#8217;t even online, so a number like this, which is nearly 70 million Americans, is pert darn good for a site that really does have a specialized use case.  When 70 million Americans are aware of BrandSavant.com, I will almost certainly have to add an employee <img src='http://brandsavant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The other way to look at it is that it is, as you suggest, a low number &#8211; but a number is only low in comparison to some other frame of reference.  In this case, the number looks low compared to Facebook and Twitter, which are the other frames of reference we have released in this data set.  To that I would probably offer that it isn&#8217;t so much that the LinkedIn number is low, but that the Twitter number is crazy huge.</p>
<p>In either case it speaks to the potential LinkedIn still has to grow.</p>
<p>Awesome question, DJ &#8211; you keep comin&#8217; back, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Waldow</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/linkedin-usage-grows-300-in-two-years/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Waldow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=540#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Tom - 

The percentage of folks who are aware of LinkedIn is shocking. I would have expected it to be well north of 50%. Any theories on why that # is so low?

DJ Waldow
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory
@djwaldow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>The percentage of folks who are aware of LinkedIn is shocking. I would have expected it to be well north of 50%. Any theories on why that # is so low?</p>
<p>DJ Waldow<br />
Director of Community, Blue Sky Factory<br />
@djwaldow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

