<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Irrelevant For Brands?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=630#comment-849</guid>
		<description>That is putting things in perspective. In fact, Darrell Huff had stated something pretty similar in his book &quot;How to lie with statistics&quot; over 50 years ago :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is putting things in perspective. In fact, Darrell Huff had stated something pretty similar in his book &#8220;How to lie with statistics&#8221; over 50 years ago <img src='http://brandsavant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Sherman</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=630#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Well said. What really drove me crazy is they said that they analyzed &quot;more than 1800 tweets&quot;. Mashable posted a story today that (unofficially) Twitter has hit 20 billion tweets and the company itself acknowledges that there is more than 50 million tweets a day.  See the article here: http://mashable.com/2010/07/31/twitter-hits-20-billion-tweets/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. What really drove me crazy is they said that they analyzed &#8220;more than 1800 tweets&#8221;. Mashable posted a story today that (unofficially) Twitter has hit 20 billion tweets and the company itself acknowledges that there is more than 50 million tweets a day.  See the article here: <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/07/31/twitter-hits-20-billion-tweets/" rel="nofollow">http://mashable.com/2010/07/31/twitter-hits-20-billion-tweets/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Boyles</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Boyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=630#comment-838</guid>
		<description>Drawing a conclusion that Twitter is irrelevant for brands is like saying &quot;Only 12% of the time people talk, they mention brands, therefore word of mouth can&#039;t be a good method of advertising&quot;

It&#039;s not the first piece of research of it&#039;s kind, but lets hope, as you suggested that the next ones will be more intelligent, and who knows, may even draw intelligent conclusions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drawing a conclusion that Twitter is irrelevant for brands is like saying &#8220;Only 12% of the time people talk, they mention brands, therefore word of mouth can&#8217;t be a good method of advertising&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the first piece of research of it&#8217;s kind, but lets hope, as you suggested that the next ones will be more intelligent, and who knows, may even draw intelligent conclusions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=630#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Much obliged, Rick. Gotta start cutting these posts down to those last lines only :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much obliged, Rick. Gotta start cutting these posts down to those last lines only <img src='http://brandsavant.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/is-twitter-irrelevant-for-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=630#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Statistically correct. Good piece - but that last line/quote is worth the price of admission for me. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistically correct. Good piece &#8211; but that last line/quote is worth the price of admission for me. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

