<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Scott Brown Have A More &#8220;Effective&#8221; Social Media Strategy Than Martha Coakley?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/did-scott-brown-have-a-more-effective-social-media-strategy-than-martha-coakley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/did-scott-brown-have-a-more-effective-social-media-strategy-than-martha-coakley/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/did-scott-brown-have-a-more-effective-social-media-strategy-than-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=331#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Peter! Appreciate the citation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Peter! Appreciate the citation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wylie</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/did-scott-brown-have-a-more-effective-social-media-strategy-than-martha-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wylie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=331#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,
The study used data from the Suffolk University polls on Nov. 12 and Jan. 14 to derive the name recognition statistic.  The citation was in the text of the study, rather than the main points in the exec summary.  In the editing process, it was accidentally removed.  Sorry for the confusion,
Peter Wylie
Researcher
Emerging Media Research Council</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,<br />
The study used data from the Suffolk University polls on Nov. 12 and Jan. 14 to derive the name recognition statistic.  The citation was in the text of the study, rather than the main points in the exec summary.  In the editing process, it was accidentally removed.  Sorry for the confusion,<br />
Peter Wylie<br />
Researcher<br />
Emerging Media Research Council</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

