<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Unfortunate Online Survey Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/an-unfortunate-online-survey-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/an-unfortunate-online-survey-practice/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Webster</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/an-unfortunate-online-survey-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=276#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Certainly cash isn&#039;t the only answer--but fair value always is. Saving the world? I can spare 15 minutes for that! But toilet paper--I&#039;ll take the cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly cash isn&#8217;t the only answer&#8211;but fair value always is. Saving the world? I can spare 15 minutes for that! But toilet paper&#8211;I&#8217;ll take the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Lorch</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/an-unfortunate-online-survey-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Lorch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=276#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more with your point about qualification questions. It&#039;s all about trust -- a fair compact between people asking questions and people answering them. How can we expect people to answer our surveys carefully if we don&#039;t keep up our side of the trust bargain?  I&#039;d differ with you, tho&#039; about incentives. Our research shows that some people respond to cash, but others prefer to know they&#039;re making things better (e.g. for health studies) or they&#039;d like to get some information (how did I answer compared to others?) or just a sincere thanks; some are even insulted by cash offers. Better quality isn&#039;t always achieved by offering cash; matching the incentive to the individual&#039;s motivation is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more with your point about qualification questions. It&#8217;s all about trust &#8212; a fair compact between people asking questions and people answering them. How can we expect people to answer our surveys carefully if we don&#8217;t keep up our side of the trust bargain?  I&#8217;d differ with you, tho&#8217; about incentives. Our research shows that some people respond to cash, but others prefer to know they&#8217;re making things better (e.g. for health studies) or they&#8217;d like to get some information (how did I answer compared to others?) or just a sincere thanks; some are even insulted by cash offers. Better quality isn&#8217;t always achieved by offering cash; matching the incentive to the individual&#8217;s motivation is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

