<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Minor Quibble With Some Recent Twitter Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandsavant.com/a-minor-quibble-with-some-recent-twitter-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandsavant.com/a-minor-quibble-with-some-recent-twitter-statistics/</link>
	<description>Gaining Insight From Social Media Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:28:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grabbing Headlines and Survey Reporting</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/a-minor-quibble-with-some-recent-twitter-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Grabbing Headlines and Survey Reporting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=33#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] The last time I quibbled with the reporting of this data, I pointed out that most people actually update their status with Facebook, not Twitter, and showed the Compete.com traffic as a gross comparison. The gap between Facebook and Twitter continues to widen, if anything, making the wording of this particular question curious, indeed. While I will continue to highlight the improper reporting of stats like this, maybe it&#8217;s time to challenge the wording of this question itself. Asking Internet users if they use Twitter &#8220;or another service&#8221; to update their status is roughly akin to asking them if they consume &#8220;Sprite or another soft drink&#8221; and reporting the results as &#8220;Sprite Drinkers.&#8221; I realize that this would blow up the trending on this particular question, but if Pew themselves are going to continue to call this report &#8220;Twitter and Status Updating,&#8221; it would be helpful for the rest of us if they would break the question out into &#8220;Twitter status updating&#8221; and status updates on other services. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The last time I quibbled with the reporting of this data, I pointed out that most people actually update their status with Facebook, not Twitter, and showed the Compete.com traffic as a gross comparison. The gap between Facebook and Twitter continues to widen, if anything, making the wording of this particular question curious, indeed. While I will continue to highlight the improper reporting of stats like this, maybe it&#8217;s time to challenge the wording of this question itself. Asking Internet users if they use Twitter &#8220;or another service&#8221; to update their status is roughly akin to asking them if they consume &#8220;Sprite or another soft drink&#8221; and reporting the results as &#8220;Sprite Drinkers.&#8221; I realize that this would blow up the trending on this particular question, but if Pew themselves are going to continue to call this report &#8220;Twitter and Status Updating,&#8221; it would be helpful for the rest of us if they would break the question out into &#8220;Twitter status updating&#8221; and status updates on other services. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finding Credible Sources of Social Media Marketing Data</title>
		<link>http://brandsavant.com/a-minor-quibble-with-some-recent-twitter-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Finding Credible Sources of Social Media Marketing Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandsavant.com/?p=33#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] cases is not necessarily sample, which is what it is, but reporting. I wrote about this earlier in my take on the Pew numbers on Twitter, which were really numbers on every possible status update service on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cases is not necessarily sample, which is what it is, but reporting. I wrote about this earlier in my take on the Pew numbers on Twitter, which were really numbers on every possible status update service on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
