BrandSavant

Gaining Insight From Social Media Data

I gave this presentation last week on behalf of the Association for Downloadable Media, and it didn’t turn out too bad! If you have an hour to spare to see the latest research on podcast sponsorship, advertising and consumer behaviors, here it is in all its glory :)

The Edison/ADM Consumer Attitudes To Podcast Advertising Study from Tom Webster on Vimeo.

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

This is really just a brief rant, but why is it so hard to find a commercial presentation software package that does brilliant data graphs? PowerPoint is just…awful, and while Keynote makes purty slides, the graphs are more designed to be works of art, and not to clearly communicate a dense amount of information. Newcomers like Sliderocket show promise, but the range of charting tools isn’t quite there yet. Maybe I’ll succumb to Tufte’s advice, skip the slides and go with handouts–there is a fine line between data-rich graphs that are unreadable and data-poor graphs that are low-resolution chart junk.

What do you use?

Post to Twitter

{ 0 comments }

There has been a lot of recent discussion on metrics for social media, and I think it’s a healthy discussion to have. Amber Naslund has a great series on some of the metrics that matter, and K.D. Paine’s PR Measurement blog is also a really smart place to get an education on the subject. Often, the issues that people are having with social media metrics have nothing to do with the social media part–it’s a basic understanding of metrics, period.

Most of the work on this topic centers around two dimensions: the stuff you did, and the results you got. Easy peasy. But, there is another dimension to social media measurement that often gets overlooked. It gets overlooked, because it’s often a painful admission–opportunity cost. Any time you spend marketing has two costs–what it cost you to do the thing, and what you could have made doing some other thing. It’s the first thing you learn in economics, but it’s also the first thing you forget in business, because in business, as in poker and the stock market, we tend to forget the “bad beats” and artificially inflate the wins.

I’ll give you an example. My company, Edison Research, is a small, highly effective unit. We pulled off the largest single-day research study in history–the 2008 Election Exit Polls–with a full-time staff of about 25 people. We don’t really have a sales or marketing arm, per se–most of the “marketing” I do is squeezed in around client projects, so my time is definitely a finite resource. Yours is, too, so you’ll understand this story all too well.

I recently wrapped up a marketing/thought leadership initiative for the company that had a social media component. If I measured the stuff I did against the returns I got, it did OK. A bunch of people tweeted about it, a bunch more visited our site, and a bunch of trade publications covered the effort. Measured. But–and it is a very big but–I spent about 30 hours of my time, and another 40 hours or so of our staff’s time on this. Thousands of dollars, yes, and also time that could have been spent on other initiatives. I did a little post mortem on the project this week, and decided that it would have been cheaper for me to just mail everyone on our prospective client list a check for a hundred bucks and hope for the best. For the handful of prospects I really hoped to land from the effort, it would have been cheaper to hand-deliver those checks.

I’m being facetious, but only a little. The amount of time I spent on this initiative has a definite dollar cost, and those dollars could have been spent on a full-page ad in a relevant trade magazine, or an event sponsorship, or banner ads. You need to measure all of these things–because you need to know not only what the ROI of a social media initiative is, you need to know if the “I” could have been spent better, elsewhere.

Many of you engage in social media because it’s cost effective. Maybe that’s true, and maybe it isn’t–your mileage can and will vary with each initiative. But it is important that as your capital permits, you hold social media initiatives to the same standards you would hold any other marketing, PR or sales initiative. To do otherwise is to sell yourself short by failing to adequately value your time. The choices are easy when all you can “afford” to do is social media. But as you grow, you have to be able to look at social media with a clear eye, and a realistic sense of social media’s opportunity cost. Often–and I am convinced of this–it is well worth that cost. But never forget the bad beats.

This blog post took some of my time. If I consider my value–both to my company and my family–I can combine my actual salary with an aspirational, potentially inflated sense of self-worth and ballpark the cost of this post at $100. Should I have paid someone else $50 to write it instead? Those are the types of questions you should challenge yourself with, every day.

I’ve just had a bad beat, but I had the systems in place to measure that honestly, adapt my approach, and regroup for the next round. Here’s what I know:

Fail fast.

Spin lots of plates, but start them one at a time.

Measure your time, honestly.

Measure the value of your time, fairly but aspirationally.

The past is a sunk cost.

Do better. Move on.

Post to Twitter

{ 4 comments }

iPass.

January 27, 2010

People who know me, know that I’m one of the biggest Apple fan boys ever, so it might surprise them to learn that I’m going to take a pass on Apple’s new iPad. Your mileage may vary, but I have two particular use cases for such a device: First, I’m a road warrior–an inveterate frequent-flier–and [...]

Read the full article →

When Everyone Is A Pollster, What Happens To The Polls?

January 26, 2010

Pollster.com’s Mark Blumenthal posted an article on the National Journal about two new ventures bringing “professional” polling to the masses. Essentially, these new ventures (Pulse Opinion Research and Precision Polling) allow any one with a credit card to inexpensively commission and field a telephone survey (either a robo-call or a recording of the purchaser’s own [...]

Read the full article →

Two Cents on Jason Calacanis’s comScore Imbroglio

January 25, 2010

Jason Calacanis is angry at comScore and would like us all to boycott their measurement service. The gist of his ire is that comScore is now augmenting their panel-based measurement service with a server-based measure which requires sites to install a small pixel-tracker across their pages/widgets/etc. Since comScore is charging $5000 to have this tracker [...]

Read the full article →

Data Doesn’t Kill Ideas – People Do.

January 21, 2010

Seth Godin has some smart things to say on his blog almost every day, but today he said something that really stuck in my craw. His post “Too much data leads to not enough belief” has all the hallmarks of a real crowd pleaser–it’s been Tweeted hundreds of times already–with his conclusion that “data crowds [...]

Read the full article →

A Research Topic the IAB Desperately Needs To Pursue

January 20, 2010

I checked out an article on CNNMoney.com today on fitness gadgets, and it was the gazillionth article I’ve read that split a simple list post into multiple pages (one for each list item) in a desperate attempt to increase page impressions. This was the straw that broke the camel’s back, at least for this camel. [...]

Read the full article →

The Woeful State Of Survey Reporting Continues…

January 20, 2010

…with this headline from TechCrunch: Study: Internet radio reaching 32% of households. Seems harmless, except the actual survey, from L.E.K., was an online survey that made no claims to national representation (Pew estimates that 26% of American adults aren’t even online) and correctly refers to its sample as “respondents” throughout the survey. At least 95% [...]

Read the full article →

Did Scott Brown Have A More “Effective” Social Media Strategy Than Martha Coakley?

January 19, 2010

Over at the day job we are all political junkies, and even now are gearing up for our mid-term election exit polling efforts. Naturally, today’s Massachusetts special election to fill the late Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat is one we are all following closely. So when I read on the Wall Street Journal’s Washington Wire that [...]

Read the full article →